Topic Maps Published Subject Indicators – European Parliament requirements

Here are a few of the key questions that the European Parliament has been looking at:
– is it useful to create conventions for the structure of PSIDs? What would those conventions be? What would the “parts” of any structure “reflect” (namespaces, topic classes, etc.)
– should PSIDs be structured in a manner that make then re-useable in non-TM environments?
– dereferencing PSIDs: do we have any guidelines/rules for what a PSID should be de-referencable as? (I think we’ve already said it should be a UR*L*; is that enough?)
– what should a user (human or machine) expect to find at a de-referenced PS indicator? Predictable metadata types (and values from value-sets)?
– how can (human) language-specific information be handled within PS indicators?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s